Skip to main content

Are Conferences Effective Professional Development? Are They Worth the Cost?

Image: An annual calendar of international EdTech conferences

Short answer: yes. 

Longer answer: follow up is necessary. 

Why? Conferences don’t change practice, sustained professional development does. But conferences do provide new inspiration and ideas for what sustained professional development might include.

Linda Darling-Hammond’s research reminds us that the best professional development is ongoing, collaborative, practice-focused, and student-centered. Conferences light the spark, but an ongoing, collaborative structure is needed to fan the flame into a fire.

This past week, I attended the annual conference of the National Association of Independent Schools, and I attended nearly every session on artificial intelligence. It was an enriching dive into how leading schools are thinking about AI in their classrooms, and it raised questions about pedagogy, law, ethics, equity, and more.  If I were currently teaching, I wouldn’t have walked away from most sessions with tactics I could use in my classes tomorrow to teach a text, but I gathered enough frameworks, techniques and resources that I could use to start rethinking my classes and deliberately revising them over the course of, say, a summer.

This is how conferences have been effective in my experience in the past: go, gather inspiration, return, and then take the time to practice or implement the new approaches in a way that fits my setting. This last part is perhaps most important. It is also most often overlooked in our professional development systems: how can we be sure we are leveraging all that is gained from conferences?

One excellent example of how this optimally works:

Distant Reading: An award winning introduction to Digital Humanities

In the spring of 2017, I attended SXSWedu and saw Stephen Wolfram demo new features embedded in his programming language called Wolfram Language. These new features included very simple commands for performing computational functions on text. I realized that this language would be easy enough for any student to use, and was inspired to build a class around it.  This was inspiration -- but the value of the conference wouldn’t be gained until the follow up that came next.

Upon returning to school, I gathered several other English and Computer Science teachers, and we started developing a syllabus and structure for a course.  We met weekly for several months and we piloted the course the next year as a spring term elective.  It was a hit, and it was also the first application of this high powered software in any high school humanities class.  Our work back on campus was ongoing, collaborative, practice-focused, and student-centered.

Conferences are excellent places to find inspiration (and see old friends), but to make them worth the cost and time, building structures to engage with what is learned is key.


Postscript: the social and experiential component of conferences -- reunions, meeting new people, traveling to a new city, stepping out of one's context -- are intangible and significant components of the value of conferences, as well.  While this benefit of conferences cannot be measured the same way as program changes can, it can nonetheless be witnessed in the energy, vitality, and spirit that fuel our work when we return.


Popular posts from this blog

Four Ways to Measure Creativity

Assessing creative work has been a bugaboo for a good long time.  In schools it's the constant refrain: “How can you grade creative writing?”  or “It’s a poem: however it comes out is right.”  In businesses and elsewhere, people demand innovation--and are stymied with understanding how to measure it. But this is not the bugaboo we think it is--in the classroom, or in the broader world of creative work.  Here are four different ways to assess creativity, each designed for different settings: 1. Measuring How Creative a Person Is - The Guilford Model 2. Measuring How Creative a Work Is - The Taxonomy of Creative Design 3. Measuring Creative Work Against a Program - The Requirements Model 4. Measuring the Social Value of Creative Work - Csikszentmihalyi’s Model Notably, in each of these cases, what we mean by "creative" changes a little.  Sometimes "creativity" refers to divergent production (how much one produces, or how varied it is).  Sometimes "c

Taxonomy of Creative Design

Strategies to improve creativity are many, but they are also diffuse.  Little ties them together in a way that offers a coherent vision for how creativity can be understood or developed incrementally.  The Taxonomy of Creative Design, a work in progress, offers a new theory for doing so. Since creative work can be measured along spectrums of both and form and content, the Taxonomy of Creative Design offers a progression from imitation to original creation measured in terms of form and content.  In doing so, it organizes creative works into an inclusive, unifying landscape that serves not only as an analytical lens through which one might evaluate creative work, but also as a methodical approach to developing creative skills. Here is a closer look: Imitation Imitation is the replication of a previous work.  It is the painter with an easel at the museum, painting her own Mona Lisa; it is the jazz musician performing the solo of the great artist note for no

A Cognitive Model for Educators: Attention, Encoding, Storage, Retrieval (Part 2 of 14)

So how do  people learn?  What are the mechanics of memory?  Can we distill thousands of articles and books to something that is manageable, digestible, and applicable to our classrooms?   Yes.   In brief, the cognitive process of learning has four basic stages: Attention : the filter through which we experience the world Encoding : how we process what our attention admits into the mind Storage : what happens once information enters the brain Retrieval : the recall of that information or behavior Almost everything we do or know, we learn through these stages, for our learning is memory, and the bulk of our memory is influenced by these four processes: what we pay attention to, how we encode it, what happens to it in storage, and when and how we retrieve it. Here’s a closer look at each: Attention: We are bombarded by sensory information, but we attend to only a small amount of it.  We constantly process sights, sounds, smells, and more, but our attention se